Contrary to the widespread claims in our society, Armenianness was a term indicating belonging to a religious community and a geographical region, the word hay did not exist before, there was no ethnic group called hay, Armenians called themselves Armenians hundreds of years ago, spoke different languages and were representatives of different ethnic groups.(https://www.avetruthbooks.com/tag/armenian-demonym-religionym) The entire history of Armenians is fake. Europeans created this theory of history for them, and they did it on purpose. To fix the tongs in the local opposite region.
The word "Armenia" is a toponym that the Arameans brought to Urartu from the Mediterranean coast. The name Hay was invented at the end of the 17th century, it was first included in the fictional book of Movses of Khoren. Among the Armenians, there was no separate ethnic group that called itself "hay", all Armenians called themselves Armenians.
A Turkologist named Marcel Erdal found words related to the Turkish language of the 15th and 16th centuries in ancient Armenian sources in Israel. After this issue, it is no longer allowed for manuscripts. Allegedly, the works were written in 5-7 AD. But there is 16th century Turkism in it. Thus, Armenian nonsense knows no borders. The historian they call Khorenatsi is also a fictitious person. No Syriac, Latin, or Greek authors know the Syriac author whose name he refers to in his work. There is a Greek who supposedly was a student of the same teacher as Khorenatsi, whose work also exists, and Khorenatsi's name is not mentioned in it. Moreover, in that work there is a text translated from Greek by an Armenian in 1898. If they have added or shortened that work so much, the text of that work has grown in each new edition.
https://www.avetruthbooks.com/tag/criticism-of-movses-khorenatsi
The Armenian religious community is a continuation of Iranian Christianity. Since the center of Iranian Christianity is located in Armenia, the name of the community is named after the geography. Based on the language of religious texts of the community, with the influence of mass schools, starting from the 18th century, mainly in the 19th century, the modern Armenian language and therefore the modern Armenian ethnos began to be formed.
The language of the Armenians and modern DNA research are the greatest sources of light on their origins. According to DNA studies, the closest peoples to them are the Sami peoples, and almost 65-66 percent of their language consists of the lexical fund of Iranian origin.
Since unconscious ethnogenesis is a very complex process, it is also very difficult to study. But what is certain is that before the 18th century, no Armenian or Hay ethnos can be discussed.
According to the correspondence between Karabakh Christians and Peter's palace, as well as between Katalikos who lived in Ganjasar and Katalikos who lived in Uchmuazzin (Simeon, 1760-1780), there were rumors about the mountainous part of Karabakh in the beginning and second half of the 18th century. But this juggling was still very recently invented. The issue of Hay was invented at the end of the 17th century when Khorenatsi's book was fictionalized. Khorenatsi's work was published for the first time in 1695, and only after it appeared did the issue of "hay" appear.
Most of the works in the link I shared are not understandable due to their language. Therefore, he suggests reading this article as an example: https://www.avetruthbooks.com/2020/10/ekozjants-f-v-pjer-daviti-ob-armjanakh-2020.html
The state of Cilicia invented by Armenians is the result of the crusades. When Byzantium was defeated by the Oghuz in the east, it transferred a part of this community, which was its slave, and when the crusader kingdom was established in Cilicia, about a third of the population was from the Armenian community. You can read about this in the work of Hayton of Korikos, the brother of the king of Cilicia, who described the Armenian community in detail there.
The liturgical language of the Armenian community, i.e. religious texts, as well as the language of worship, was Middle Persian. Most of the people belonging to the community spoke Turkish at least in the 13th-17th centuries. I haven't been lucky enough to see more different information about their languages.
It is not known in what period the language called Middle Persian actually existed. Sasanian or early-late Parthian texts are virtually entirely in Aramaic script and in Aramaic. An unusual approach to the texts was exhibited: first they transcribed the text in Aramaic script, the text was read in Aramaic, a Semitic language, and then it was translated inexplicably into an Iranian language. It seems to me that for such silent forgery, late period Pahlavi texts written in the Arabic alphabet are used, here is a brief description of examples of Pahlavi texts written in the Arabic alphabet that were influenced by Arabic:
https://iranicaonline.org/articles/fahlaviyat?fbclid=IwAR0s6kc4E33OPfCFCNCvMACH4XA11ccLR2Yw2fkkGiXX59KENJWUp6cUtDs
The Armenian church language is the basis of the current Armenian language, but the speaking of different languages within the community has done its job and some parts of each language have entered the newly created colloquial language.
"Great Armenia", "Tigran", claimed by Armenians, occupation of territory up to Palestine, battles against Romans, etc. In response, those people were all representatives of different nations. The fake history of Armenians made up people from Bactria and Arshaki and made up a lot of stories in their name. The Urartian archaeological remains near Yerevan are also fake, they were installed during the Soviet era.
There are no ancient Armenian churches. Alphabets are not ancient either. Those who ruled the Armenian region fought with the Romans or submitted to them.
No comments:
Post a Comment