All Sasanian and Pahlavi texts are in Aramaic.
They take the text, read it in Aramaic, transcribe it, and then translate it into Iranian in the third step.
They did the same with the religious texts of Manichaeism. In Darband, for example, there was no Sasanian script as a language, ie. Maybe the Sasanian period is Aramaic. Or the texts with Arabic script during the period of Arab and Turkish rule. However, Aramaic was the second most important language besides the language of the Achaemenid ruling dynasty, and this writing existed at that time. Bisut's texts, discovered under suspicious circumstances, are in three languages; Achaemenian language (similar to Slavic), Aramaic and Elamite. Aramaic was a Semitic language, Elam was an isolated language like Sumerian. The Arameans were a very important people. There were many Arabs early on. Arameans constituted the second most important group in the Achaemenid, Parthian, and Sasanian states. In all three states, their language was "lingua franca". Without exception, all late Pahlavi and all Sasanian texts were in Aramaic.
Iranian peoples most probably came from India about 2700 years ago. The Medes came with 5 tribes and were nomadic. Achaemenid period Old Persian is actually Old Slavic. Sassanid era Aramaic texts are translated into Iranian language. It can be understood that they take the material from this period: https://iranicaonline.org/articles/fahlaviyat
There were no Pahlavi (Parsiq/Partav) inscriptions. There are no actual Pahlavi language inscriptions, the inscriptions that do exist are in Aramaic (in the Semitic language). This language of the Persians was called Parsi/Farsi (Parsiq) in ancient times. The language of the Achaemenid dynasty is similar to the Proto-Slavic language of Khakamanish. There are 3 languages that you can rely on: Behishtun, that is. apart from that, as far as I know, there is no writing from the Khakamanish period. They made up a fictitious ancient Persian language. Everything in the Sasanian period is in Aramaic. Darband inscriptions are also in Aramaic. But everyone thinks Sasanian (Middle Persian). For example, "malka" is written in the text, that is, "malik". It is from the Sami-Aramaic language. They translate it into Persian and write "shah". Sogdian is the oldest written Persian dialect. Today's Persian is actually a Dari language. This language currently exists in Afghanistan. The modern Persian language came from the east, from Khorasan. The first written example of New Persian, i.e. modern Persian, was written in 960: Tarjumeyi Tarikhi Tabari (written by Balami, who was a vizier of the Samanis). The official language of present-day Tajikistan is also a Persian dialect. The Dari language has not seen the reformation in these two wings, that is, the Dari language has not experienced purification. Persian-speaking people from Afghanistan call Iran "mainland Iran" (Our Mother Iran). Sogdian and old Khorezm languages are separate. Khorezm is actually not Mavaraunnahr, but a small area on the shore of Aral Lake. The Sogdians were abolished by the Turks and the Sassanids. Turks transfer the remaining few parts to East Turkestan and become Turks there. If we believe the late Arabic authors, the Sasanian language was a Dari language.
The Aramaic language is a non-vowel language. Transcription becomes very easy. But it's hard to read. Scythians and Cimmerians are considered Iranian people. This is not true. This name belongs to a very large group.
During the Achaemenid period Sakas were in contact with the Greeks. They were considered as Iranian peoples. It's just that the authors of that time did not know those geographies. Even before Christ, they did not know the east of today's Iran correctly.
The goal of the Aryanists is to minimize the history and importance of the Sami-speaking culture. Therefore, they turn all the cultural monuments in the south of present-day Iran and lead to a fictitious language tree called Indo-European. Later, this view had two consequences.
1) German Nazism based on Arianism cracked the heads of the Jews and resulted in genocide.
2) Reza Savaduki, a Cossack officer who staged a coup in Iran, spent oil money and hired many hired historians and journalists to write the history of all empires and states that came and went from the region in the name of Iran. Rza, who did not even see the face of his father, and did not even have a surname, was written as the follower of a 2500-year-old dynasty, and a bunch of low-level politicians and society from around the world came to celebrate this 2500-year anniversary. This history must be rewritten and rewritten. And it is written. Previously, scientific works of Reza Ziya-Ebrahimi were cited as an example in such discussions. And one - Ahmed Mohammadpour:
https://www.academia.edu/107345842/Persian_orientalism_Raciolinguistic_ideologies_and_the_construction_of_Iranianness_?fbclid=IwAR1GWeXzPHhJN5TlSCeYB5nL-kSszi0TudlJ6nfScfyrGLz9H2CUsWefdEU
We provide this link so that you can read it for free. It is in genuine academic publications and it is paid.
https://www.avetruthbooks.com/2023/12/mostafa-vaziri-iran-as-imagined-nation-the-construction-of-national-identity-2013.html
No comments:
Post a Comment